The Economic Implications of the Recent
Nature Disasters or Calamities in the Country
Natural
Calamities
|
Man-made actions/ behaviour that worsened
the effect/s on the microeconomic level & macroeconomic level.
|
Losses or Damages
|
Needs for relief and rehabilitation
|
Needs for disaster and risk reduction or
prevention and management
|
1.Typhoon Vicente local
name FERDIE; July 18-26
2. Typhoon Saola local name GENER;July 26-August 4
3.Tropical Storm Kai-Tak local name HELEN; August
12-18
4. Typhoon Guchol, local
name BUTCHOY; June 10-22
5. A magnitude 6.7 (Mw) undersea blind thrust earthquake occurred off the
coast of Negros Oriental, Philippines,
on Monday, February 6, 2012 at 11:49 PST
|
Excessive cutting of tress
& pollution, deforestation, global warming
Excessive cutting of tress
& pollution, deforestation, global warming. Too much garbage and improper
disposal of it.
Excessive cutting of tress
& pollution, deforestation, global warming.
Excessive cutting of tress
& pollution, deforestation, global warming
Natural shaking of earth.
Deforestation is a caused of landslides.
|
Widespread rains and gusty winds in Luzon & Visayas region; At least 2
people died and 6 others were officially missing.
Widespread rains; Flooding is imminent; three roads in
northern Luzon were impassable; 73
death toll; at least 519,000 people affected; More than 17,500 were
staying in evacuation centers & 6 missing & 51 fatalities; about ₱404 million
(US$9.6 million) damaged, half of which was due to agricultural losses.
Triggering flash floods & landslides ; several highways were
cut off because of landslides; 109 death toll;
Widespread heavy rain; only 310 people notable affected by
the storm; one person drowned in in Rizal; 2 death toll
& 80 injured; Total economic
losses were estimated in excess of ¥8 billion
(US$100 million).
Movement on a previously undiscovered fault;
Houses & buildings collapsed, while others sustained damages. The
triggered numerous landslides which buried houses & people; water services,
along with electricity & telecommunications, were reported to be cut off.
|
They highly needed basic
necessities such as foods, clothing & water.
About sixty families in Rodriguez,
Rizal were evacuated
At least 3,555 people were evacuated from their homes in La
Union and Pangasinan; providing relief aid to nearly a million people;
216,000 at evacuation centres
Red Cross, government & other NGO’S provided victims’
needs
Local officials addressed
the needs of the victims
|
Airports and seaports were advised to not engage with the
weather as zero visibility in air and sea.
Domestic and international flights delayed; Small fishing
crafts were advised to not engage in the water; Seaports were also advised to
cancel their trips; Early on July 30, classes were suspended from pre-school
to tertiary level in Metro Manila & nearby provinces;
Twenty northern provinces had been placed under storm
warnings before the storm hit; warned residents
living in low-lying and mountainous areas against possible landslides and
flash flood due rains ranging from heavy to intense.; officials ordered the
pre-emptive evacuation of residents in villages along one of the major river
systems in Pampanga;
Domestic and international flights delayed; Small fishing
crafts were advised to not engage in the water; Seaports were also advised to
cancel their trips;
|
The Philippines is actually
one of the most disaster-prone countries in the world. Situated inside the
Pacific Ring of Fire, the Philippine archipelago is battered by at least 25
major storms every year. And because of climate change, it also suffers from
extreme weather disturbances. To pin the blame
on climate change for the casualties is wrong since many of the weather-related
deaths are preventable. It must be emphasized that the negative effects of
climate change are compounded by poverty, bad governance, and destructive
economic activities.
The government’s inefficiency during crisis situations was exposed
when it failed to mobilize its resources on time and coordinate the efforts of
all agencies during the recent flooding and earthquake disasters. The public has
the right to demand the formulation of a comprehensive disaster risk reduction
program that can save lives and minimize casualties during freak weather
events. Indeed, politicians were able to gather and distribute relief goods to
survivors, but scientists and environmentalists insist that the government
should have prioritized the setting up of an effective early warning system,
emergency drills, quick response teams, and the construction of adequate
infrastructure in calamity-prone areas as part of its disaster preparedness
program.
The “inconvenient truths” of
climate change have already been thoroughly discussed by academics, the media
and even government institutions. Everybody knows that strong typhoons,
earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions are common in this part of the world. The
Philippines is a country that should excel in disaster preparedness, but
unfortunately its climate change adaptation program is a major disaster.
No comments:
Post a Comment